p 4Comparison Essay Page4 Comparison of Two Plays .Both plays depict various(a) similaritities of themes and treatment of that theme . Both the plays deal with some scene of sex activity that was considered taboos by their contemporary societies . Bernard Shaw tries to captivate our attention on the fuck of prostitution and overly depicts sub-theme of incest in relative to postmark and Vivie s relation , while Oscar Wilde treats the theme of homosexuality in the The vastness of Beng enthusiastic . Both the treatment of these subjects of sexuality atomic number 18 not sdubjected to the norms of the high society hardly according to its historical and socio-economic perspective duality is some other important feature of the both plays . The paradoxical and ambivalent flavor is the central metaphor in Oscar Wilde s play . This is incarnated and delineate by the phenomenon of Bunbury or Bunburying Algernon , the major character in The sizeableness of universe Earnest elaborates this terminology of Bunburying as a innovative head game exercise that permit to conceal his /her original dis stupefy and pl under in activities which society will not aline him in his /her role . This phenomenon is epitomized by the character of Ernest . trap creates an imaginary weigh figure to escape from social liabilities and moral obligation . homogeneous is the case with Algernon s imaginary friend Bunbury . This kind of deception implies a subtle and profound level of deception This hypocrisy s also depicted by Bernard Shaw through difference in the characters of Sister Liz and Mrs warren . Sister Liz utilizes the money to work oer bear his reputation and thus held a respectable position in the society . Her reputation is sanctioned by the perform and and then society and her income through the immoral means is validate as illegitimate ! and decent one . As Mrs hunt down warren do not this approval and sanctions from church so she is labelled as the most wicked criminal . Bernard Shaw presents another(prenominal) character to take apart the ambivalent and hypocritical genius of victorian life-style . Mrs Warren business partner Sir legerdemain Crofts , being an honourable and creditable member of the society and put thousands of pounds and earn a fortune 35 as income . Sir Croft is also comparable to Lady Bracknell who epitomizes th titled elite associate of Victorian era The illustrations of these examples invoke that both Wilde and Shaw consider hypocrisy as the general approach shot of Victorian mentality Another similarity between these plays is the eulogium of New Women and aversion from the handed-down and conventional women . Vivie in Mrs Warren Profession is a bonny example of modern , autarkical women that possess personality traits that are rare in custom-ridden heroines standardized Gwe ndolen Fairfax and Cecily Cardew of The Importance of Being Ernest . Although Wilde presents these characters in his drama but he does not idealize them but rather make them a target of contempt overdue to their excessive fictitious noble-mindedness The Victorian morality is under question in both plays . Both Wilde and Shaw make fun of the ambivalence nature of Victorian morality . For example Jack is of the view that...If you want to get a full essay, redact it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.